万维读者网>世界军事论坛>帖子
CNMD 巴铁网上的反应
送交者: zippers 2010-01-12 23:26:51 于 [世界军事论坛]

巴铁网上的反应


gpit 
SENIOR MEMBERS
From the mouth, China never says anything about 96-hour, but in action it only needs 96-minutes to finish a clown.

applesauce 
FULL MEMBERS
Actions have always spoken louder than word
but i do love how they add "this is for purely defense purposes" on every military project or development 

Martian2 
FULL MEMBERS
This is very interesting. When the U.S. is perceived to be provoking China, the PLA shows us something new. Perhaps the U.S. should poke them some more, I'm curious to discover what else the Chinese are keeping out of sight. 

razgriz19 
FULL MEMBERS
china bi$#h slap US! LMAO
im loving this!
long live sino-pak friendship!!! 

hembo 
FULL MEMBERS
Congrats to the chinese members. Great achievement!!! Keep it up! 

faithfulguy 
FULL MEMBERS
I am really impress by the Chinese military. The first interceptor they announce is a mid course one. This is the most difficult one to accomplish and make Thaad look like child's play. 

kvLin 
SENIOR MEMBERS
I guess this is to tell the Obama administration: you don't wanna break off the military communication as a big new anti-means added into the PLA unclearness list. 

oct605032048 
FULL MEMBERS
We do hope that China can get along well with Russia and US as well. But friendship depends not on China's attitude right? I also don't believe this test is to protest US's decision to sell pac-3 to Taiwan. 

Since last time China attacked a satellite in 2007(also on 1.11) they've made great improve. GMD and the kkv(kinetic kill vehicle) capability is far beyond that scale.

The aim of the test is purely defensive and to enhance China's ability in defending herself against the threat of 'rogue states'. Besides US and Russia's 10000 warheads, there are other troubling countries possess nuclear bombs and missiles which can 'target the city of Harbin' at least we have to protect ourselves in the first 96 hours in any hypothetical wars. 

faithfulguy 
FULL MEMBERS
India does have anti-missile defence. But its more in the line of THAAD than an mid course defence. The only other country in the world that had tested a mid course ABM is US. 

mr_cool 
FULL MEMBERS
Congratulations China! I'm well happy!!
Next project: A full Stars wars Defence shield (Like the one America is/was trying to build in Europe!) 

Martian2 
FULL MEMBERS
I am starting to believe that many assessments of China's military capabilities are just mere guesses. It's becoming a tradition in January (whether 2007 or 2010) for China to show us a new technological capability.
For some unknown reason, the CIA cannot seem to obtain information about China's weapons development. In contrast, for example, Western intelligence gathering and projections of Russian or Iranian military capabilities have been fairly accurate. There have been no real surprises coming out of Russia or Iran.
I don't know how China manages to keep its military secrets in the modern world of spy satellites and communication intercepts. Based on their track record, I can only conclude that Western intelligence agencies don't really know what's going on with the PLA.

In the last few years, the Pentagon has been surprised by the following:
J-10: China takes a jump from Mig-21s to F-16s technology.
052C: Chinese Aegis-class destroyer; Pentagon had been puzzled by talk of Chinese "magic shield" naval ship (hint to the Pentagon: Aegis in Greek means "magic shield")
KJ-2000 AWACS: U.S. went to great lengths to block Phalcon deal between China and Israel in year 2000. China builds an AESA AWACS on her own.
I can't remember whether Type 093 and Type 094 nuclear submarines were deployed ahead of the estimated dates by the West. I think the nuclear submarines were deployed in 2004 and the original Western estimates were 2009 or 2010, but I'm not sure.
ASAT in 2007. U.S. Pentagon general gave a briefing on that very afternoon on Capitol Hill saying that Chinese conventional ASAT capability was "at least 10 years away."
Underground "Great Wall:" Chinese 5,000 KM strategic nuclear counterstrike capability. I had never heard of this project until photos showed up on Chinese tv of the massive underground (and/or under-mountain) tunnels.
Chinese NMD: China successfully intercepts a ballistic missile during mid-course. China has proven that she is making great strides in building a national ballistic missile defense.

Oh, lest I forget, during the 60th anniversary parade, I think we saw the Chinese Anti-ship ballistic missile (i.e. ASBM) that had been in development for 13 years. The ASBM is designed to destroy large naval ships with a terminal velocity of Mach 10.
And, only recently, the Pentagon was saying that a Chinese stealth fighter would not be deployed until 2025 at the earliest. A few months later, while being interviewed on tv for the 60th anniversary of the PLAAF, a deputy general said that the Chinese stealth fighter will be deployed by 2017-2019.
What I want to know is: What other surprises can we expect from the PLA? Also, when is the CIA and military intelligence going to give us a "heads-up" on the PLA weapons programs? 

SinoIndusFriendship 
SENIOR MEMBERS
This is a real hot topic. What is REALLY SURPRISING is how quickly articles are written about this successful test immediately after it occured. And this is all over the world. Which indicates how closely China is followed by the world. There are more news around the world about China (most positive, only a few mis-construed) in EVERY COUNTRY! Contrast this with only 10 years ago and no one paid any attention. Now every peoples are linked to one another.
0.00%(0) 0.00%(0) 0.00%(0)
当前新闻共有0条评论
笔  名 (必选项):
密  码 (必选项):
注册新用户
标  题 (必选项):
内  容 (选填项):