http://www.forbes.com/sites/steveschaefer/2012/05/10/jpmorgan-dives-after-hours-on-word-of-surprise-800-million-investment-loss/?partner=yahootix
盘后摩根跳水,8亿美元投资亏损的消息“令人震惊”
更黑的是坏消息还没有完。。。。
在提交截止周四收盘后,摩根大通表示,在企业单位的净收入将在今后一个时期更加不稳定。 CIO们已经看到了显着的市场,其合成的信贷组合损失,该公司表示,一个已经“被证明是高风险,更不稳定,更比以前所认为的公司的经济对冲的有效组合。”
虽然从销售信贷有关的职位实现的收益部分抵消,CIO的总投资组合的损失“超出约80亿美元的成本。”
周四盘后向SEC提交的全部细节中的10-Q。
迅速安排电话会议上,董事长兼首席执行官杰米·戴蒙称为战略“硬伤”。它的执行是百病“的错误,草率和判断错误,”戴蒙说,在电话会议上提醒那些问题无关与客户。
戴蒙警告,展开了“令人震惊”和“自作自受”的错误在一段期间内,可能会引起一些波动加剧,因为该公司将负责的位置,将予以纠正。 “我们不打算做一些愚蠢的事,”他说。 “波动将是高,它可能花费10亿美元或更多。”
摩根大通的股份,作为银行,经受住了破灭的房地产泡沫和随后的危机比大多数的例子经常举行,在不寻常的高容量交易暴跌5.2%,至38.63美元,此前小时。分析师迈克·梅奥被称为银行在最近的说明“同类最佳”,但仍轰出两个缺口降级的股票。
JPMorgan Dives After-Hours On Word Of Surprise $800 Million Investment Loss
JPMorgan Chase said it has encountered significant mark-to-market losses in its Chief Investment Office (CIO) since the end of the first quarter, and anticipates an $800 million loss in its corporate and private equity segment during the second quarter.
In a filing after the closing bell Thursday, JPMorgan said net income in its Corporate unit will be more volatile in future periods. The CIO has seen significant mark-to-market losses in its synthetic credit portfolio, the firm said, a portfolio that has “proven to be riskier, more volatile and less effective as an economic hedge than the Firm previously believed.”
Though partially offset by realized gains from sales of credit-related positions, the losses in the CIO’s total portfolio “exceeded its cost by approximately $8 billion.”
The full details came in a 10-Q filed with the SEC after the bell Thursday.
On a rapidly-arranged conference call, Chairman and Chief Executive Jamie Dimon called the strategy “flawed.” Its execution was riddled with “errors, sloppiness and bad judgement,” Dimon said, reminding those on the call that the issues had nothing to do with clients.
Dimon warned that unwinding the “egregious” and “self-inflicted” mistakes will be rectified, during a period that may entail some increased volatility because the firm will be responsible in in getting out of the positions. “We’re not going to do something stupid,” he said. “Volatility will be high, and it could cost $1 billion or more.”
Dealing with the issue will not impact the firm’s plans to return capital to shareholders in 2012, Dimon said. When asked why the firm decided to disclose the information, he said “it’s not going to stop us from building a great company,” but that JPMorgan wanted to be transparent given that the situation arose so soon after the end of the first quarter.
Shares of JPMorgan, frequently held up as an example of a bank that withstood the bursting of the housing bubble and subsequent crisis better than most, plunged 5.2% to $38.63 in uncommonly high volume trading after hours. Analyst Mike Mayo called the bank “best in class” in a recent note, but still smacked the stock with a two-notch downgrade.
The firm was also hit by a cut to the ratings of its residential mortgage servicing unit from Standard & Poor’s after the bell Thursday. The action is not exactly the rating cuts Wall Street watchers have been waiting for, with Moody’s due to wrap up a review of its ratings on firms including Morgan Stanley and Bank of America in the near future.
|