万维读者网>世界游戏论坛>帖子
所谓中方死43人毫无根据,整个胡扯八道
送交者: x-file 2020-06-17 03:45:45 于 [世界游戏论坛]

India-China dispute: 43 Chinese soldiers killed? Media outlets and journalists mislead

Pooja Chaudhuri17th June 2020

AvatarPooja ChaudhuriPooja_Chaudhuri

On June 16, the ongoing border dispute between India and China took a critically violent turn as the Indian side reported the death of 20 soldiers in Ladakh’s Galwan Valley.

Press Trust of India@PTI_News

Indian Army says a total of 20 Indian soldiers have died in Ladakh's Galwan Valley

5,08711:59 - 16 Jun 2020Twitter Ads information and privacy
1,272 people are talking about this

Soon after, the news of “43 Chinese troops killed” in the face-off began doing the rounds. This was tweeted by DD News which credited the information to “agency reports”.

Hindi media outlets NavjivanIndia TV and ABP News claimed the same.

Several others – Major Gaurav AryaIndia TV anchors Rajat Sharma and Sushant SinhaABP News journalist Sumit AwasthiNewsX anchor Shehzad Poonawalla – also jumped on the bandwagon.

A Twitter handle News Line IFE cited Gaurav Arya as the source and put out a tweet with the same claim. In an earlier Alt News Fact Check, News Line IFE was found to be the source of the unverified claim that five Chinese soldiers were killed in the clashes.

OpIndia, its editor Nupur Sharma and Twitter user The Skin Doctor also promoted the ‘news’ of 43 Chinese soldiers killed.

India Today anchor Rajdeep Sardesai wrote that ANI claimed based on “Chinese intercepts” that “43 Chinese soldiers [were] killed in the clashes”. He further wrote that there hasn’t been any confirmation from the Chinese side.

National Spokesperson of VHP Vijay Shankar Tiwari wrote, “43 चीनी सैनिक भी मारे गए (43 Chinese soldiers were also killed).”

Fact-check

The claim was based on news agency ANI’s tweet which quoted “sources” and claimed that the Chinese have suffered 43 casualties, including the dead and injured.

ANI@ANI

Indian intercepts reveal that Chinese side suffered 43 casualties including dead and seriously injured in face-off in the Galwan valley: Sources confirm to ANI

View image on Twitter
24.2K11:24 - 16 Jun 2020Twitter Ads information and privacy
10.9K people are talking about this

Editor of ANI live services Ishaan Prakash quoted tweeted ANI and wrote, “First confirmation of numbers of injured/dead in the Chinese side”, which is the meaning of the word ‘casualties’.

ishaan prakash@ishaan_ANI

First confirmation of numbers of injured/dead in the Chinese side https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1272927922177765376 

ANI@ANI

Indian intercepts reveal that Chinese side suffered 43 casualties including dead and seriously injured in face-off in the Galwan valley: Sources confirm to ANI

View image on Twitter
5211:25 - 16 Jun 2020Twitter Ads information and privacy
22 people are talking about this

It is to be noted that ANI did not give an exact figure on the number of Chinese soldiers who died but wrote that the number “43” includes both killed and wounded.

What do the official figures state?

The Chinese government has not revealed the number of casualties on their side. The Editor-in-Chief of China-based Global Times tweeted this earlier today. Furthermore, no official figures on the Chinese casualties have been put out by the Indian army as well.

Hu Xijin 胡锡进@HuXijin_GT

Chinese side didn’t release number of PLA casualties in clash with Indian soldiers. My understanding is the Chinese side doesn’t want people of the two countries to compare the casualties number so to avoid stoking public mood. This is goodwill from Beijing.

5,72209:40 - 16 Jun 2020Twitter Ads information and privacy
6,586 people are talking about this

Defence journalist Shiv Aroor tweeted, “NO official word on Chinese casualty figures, all leaks/source stuff doing rounds.”

Shiv Aroor@ShivAroor

*NO official word on Chinese casualty figures, all leaks/source stuff doing rounds*

3,70511:42 - 16 Jun 2020Twitter Ads information and privacy
786 people are talking about this

Deputy Editor at The Indian Express Sushant Singh similarly tweeted that there has been no official army statement on the number of Chinese casualties, “43 or 430 or whatever”.

Sushant Singh@SushantSin

There is not a word about any Chinese casualties, fatal or non fatal, in the official army statement.  43 or 430 or whatever!

2,14312:05 - 16 Jun 2020Twitter Ads information and privacy
775 people are talking about this

Therefore, ANI’s tweet on alleged casualties on the Chinese side, both dead and injured, was misrepresented by many as “43 Chinese soldiers killed” in the skirmish. It is also noteworthy that neither the Chinese side nor any prominent Indian defence journalist has confirmed the number of casualties in the People’s Liberation Army (PLA).

[Update: The copy earlier claimed that Rajdeep Sardesai claimed that 43 Indian soldiers were killed. The error has been corrected.]Donate to Alt News!
Independent journalism that speaks truth to power and is free of corporate and political control is possible only when people start contributing towards the same. Please consider donating towards this endeavour to fight fake news and misinformation.


0.00%(0) 0.00%(0) 0.00%(0)
当前新闻共有0条评论
笔  名 (必选项):
密  码 (必选项):
注册新用户
标  题 (必选项):
内  容 (选填项):