大嘴巴抽的这家伙毫无还手之力-世界游戏论坛-军事论坛-世界论坛网（手机版）

大嘴巴抽的这家伙毫无还手之力

送交者: x-file 2020-05-18 06:38:37 于 [世界游戏论坛]

Forget observer status. Accept Taiwan as a full member.WHO is not the UN, but it is a UN organization. Remember that Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Belarus, etc. all had UN memberships when part of the Soviet Union that also was a member. It should be no problem to have two full memberships for countries that govern different areas of what is historically considered China.Nowadays Russia is the successor state to the USSR and inherited the USSR’s seats for membership in the General Assembly, the Security Council, and other UN organizations.The Republic of China cofounded the UN and had one of the permanent seats on the Security Council. The Republic of China might just be the province of Taiwan and a few more islands today, but it still exists. There is no successor state. Taiwan/Republic of China should have its seats restored. Communist China is the rebellious entity, not Taiwan as Communist China claims. Communist China should be proud of its accomplishment of successfully rebelling against RoC and now governing most of China. Communist China - the People’s Republic of China - has all the hallmarks of statehood and should keep its general memberships in the UN and UN organizations like WHO.There are only five permanent seats on the Security Council and, unlike Russia, Communist China by definition is not a successor state because the original state still exists and should have its founding seat. Thus, Communist China should only have a seat on the Security Council if it gets elected to one of the ten non-permanent seats by the General Assembly.

收起

隐藏 9 条回复

RedFireTree's view on India

39 分钟前（修改过）

such ignorant and wrote so much for nothing, go to read UN resolution 2758 first will you???here I help you:"United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758Restoration of the lawful rights of the People’s Republic of China in the United NationsThe General Assembly,Recalling the principles of the Charter of the United Nations,Considering that the restoration of the lawful rights of the People’s Republic of China is essentialboth for the protection of the Charter of the United Nations and for the cause that the UnitedNations must serve under the Charter,Recognizing that the representatives of the Government of the People’s Republic of China arethe only lawful representatives of China to the United Nations and that the People’s Republic ofChina is one of the five permanent members of the Security Council,Decides to restore all its rights to the People’s Republic of China and to recognize therepresentatives of its Government as the only legitimate representatives of China to the UnitedNations, and to expel forthwith the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek from the place whichthey unlawfully occupy at the United Nations and in all the organizations related to it.1976th plenary meeting,25 October 1971"

if you are not blind, I wish

read again!"Decides to restore all its rights to the People’s Republic of China and to recognize therepresentatives of its Government as the only legitimate representatives of China to the UnitedNations, and to expel forthwith the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek from the place whichthey unlawfully occupy at the United Nations and in all the organizations related to it."original document link:https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/192054?ln=en

收起

Brooke King

33 分钟前

RedFireTree's view on India, I am aware of Resolution 2758. I’m also aware of Resolution 1668, which governed representation of China in the UN. The UN can rectify the overcorrection of 2758 and also the previous slight against the PRC by recognizing both governments.

RedFireTree's view on India

28 分钟前

@Brooke King that just means you intentionally trying to distort the document it will not work, go to find some other ways since everyone with middle

school education can understand it correctly.school education can understand it correctly.

RedFireTree's view on India

19 分钟前（修改过）

go fool Indians, that may work, hehe as for 1668?? you used a resolution of 1968 for 1971's UN assembly decision??1668 just want to make PRC get into UN more difficult.

it did not work. USA had another proposal to try to save some face of TW but rejected by UN.

RedFireTree's view on India

13 分钟前

@Brooke King you are aware of resolution of 2758, then it said "expel forthwith the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek from the place whichthey unlawfully occupy at

the United Nations and in all the organizations related to it" WHO is an organization that related to UN, seems you have difficulty of understanding it??so you said " WHO is not the UN, but it is a UN organization. "??

Brooke King

7 分钟前

RedFireTree's view on India, 2758 is almost 50 years old. I do not say it was out of order. I say it overcorrected. It appears you did not read my words before trying

to insult me again. I hope you get a well deserved vacation soon, whatever it takes for you to have civil discussion.

RedFireTree's view on India

7 分钟前

@Brooke King "by recognizing both governments"??? that was just a proposal, and was rejected by UN, not UN resolution, can you tell the difference??

RedFireTree's view on India

4 分钟前

@Brooke King 50 years old?? so??do you know how old is US constitution??

RedFireTree's view on India

2 分钟前

@Brooke King insulted you?? you said you know everything but you were trying to distort history, do you think you should be "insulted" or not??

RedFireTree's view on India

1秒前

@Brooke King just want to let you know, you may be able to fool someone, you cannot fool everyone. especially today there is something called internet, be smarter next time. civil discussion with you??not interested, nothing to discuss with someone intentionally providing fake information and intentionally distort history.

0.00%(0) 0.00%(0) 0.00%(0)


军事论坛	时事论坛	汽车论坛	摄影论坛
股票论坛	游戏论坛	音乐论坛

当前新闻共有0条评论